Πέμπτη, 27 Φεβρουαρίου 2014

36. (Paragraph 10) .Capitalism, Fascism, Socialism, Communism, Direct Democracy and galactic Civilizations. The 10 basic earthly human freedoms. New human rights:The unconditional monthly subsidy in all ages, for survival. The human right to direct (electronic) democracy. The dollar/euro monetary system and the Draconian Alliance.





The political realizations that I am going to write here  have been  a bit difficult for me too. 


I grew up in a Capitalistic, country, and I had enjoyed, the kind of freedom, that there is compared, to e.g. older  totalitarian states like the ex Soviet Union, or Mao's China. I was never a communist. Nevertheless I enjoyed reading the ancient Greek philosopher Plato in his book "Republic", where at the end Socrates, surprises every other speaker, claiming that the ideal republic is neither  those that have the money, neither of the aristocrats, neither of the philosophers. That the ideal town-republic, that he called Kallipolis (=good city) was one that everybody was equal to everybody! That is much like the French revolution triplet Equality-Brotherhood-Justice.

I was not either very much of a socialist, as I was considering it rather romantic, and naive.
I would say that I was rather a capitalist with love for democracy and freedom.
After reading in the web the reliable information about the galactic civilizations, and in particular, about the Andromeda Alliance and the Draconian Alliance, I soon came to realize, that patterns like capitalism, aristocracy, socialism, existed in a recognizable way, although by far, more undreamed.
1) In particular, the Draconians, had a very well recognizable, political system of Kingdom and genetic aristocracy, with the top being a Queen rather than a King (Even monsters recognize that the vulnerability of the feminine is to be honored)  
2) Then the half-reptilians of Sirius B, are mentioned to be of the side Serve-the-self, which of course is very much recognizable in capitalism, as the indulgence to private property, private interest  and individualism even above the common good.
3) The civilizations of the Andromeda alliance, also , showed clear patterns of emphasis to serve-the-others , altruism, and values of the collective good at least as equal to individualism. Being societies within telepathy, the hierarchical political and power structures do not work there. The simultaneous holographic flow of information, the absence of the use of money, seemed to me that it is by dar more advanced than any socialism, communism, French revolution ideals or Plato's and Socrates Kallipolis in Republic. Actually the civilizations of Andromedan Alliance are more socialistic than any of the socialist of earth, and at the same time more individualistic than any capitalist of earth! One of the reasons is that they manifest both very advanced technology (that the Draconians do no have) and at the same time very advanced spirituality and morality (that the Draconians also do not have). 
So it became clear to me: 
a) The Andromeda Alliance which is the most technologically and spiritually advanced group of civilizations in the galaxies, is towards ideals , values and principles, that would find relevant to socialism rather than capitalism!
b) While the Draconian Alliance is towards, old-fashioned kingdoms, and serve-the-self types of societies.  

The Andromedans gave the information that right now there are 22 other planetary civilizations in the  nearby galaxies that are in the process of lift-up , and the Andromedan alliance has undertaken the effort to help them in the process of the  lift-up. And all of these 22 civilizations , were approached thousands of years ago, by the Draconian Alliance, that secretly , with underground bases, organized gradual and imperceptible enslaving of them, towards later to more open forms of tyranny. From the 22 civilizations, 14 of them right now have been liberated from the enslaving by the Draconian Alliance with the help of the Andromedan Alliance. Earth has not been liberated yet, but it is in the process. The down side of capitalism which is its high inequalities is a symptom of the tactics of the Draconians on earth. But also the downside of the historic socialism, which is lack of freedhom is also a symptom of the tactics of the Draconians on earth. Eventually  earth will be liberated soon, with the help of the Andromedan Alliance, and many active regressive aliens from the side of the Draconian Alliance and active earthly humans in the secrete enslaving of earth  will be arrested and prisoner , in special installations in the galaxies. 

So in galaxy seems to be the other way around than what we are used to know on Earth! On Earth we are used to know that serve-the-self capitalism is technologically more advanced, that the supposed to be serve-the-people ex Soviet Union, or China with its inferior technology! 
And this gave to me a clear additional idea, why the visiting and presence of the non-earthly galactic civilizations on earth  has been kept secret, especially from the countries of NATO: "If people would know that the more powerful, spiritually and technologically advanced group of civilizations in the galaxies, is more socialistic and less capitalistic, than  our civilization, how would we hold our power over the masses, with our traditional capitalistic principles and values? 
On the other hand this applies also to governments of the ex Soviet Union and China, as in spite the fact that they were claiming to be socialistic and serve-the-many, they were another form of oligarchy, of the bureaucracy and communistic party. 
True principles of the type serve-the-others, require not only social institutions and politics but also the appropriate evolution of the soul and high (spin) frequency of the physical bodies. 
Therefore centers of traditional capitalistic power in societies, would have natural denial, to admit, not only the existence of the more advanced Andromeda Alliance, but also, their values and principles. 

This explains also, why awakening towards being aware of other galactic civilizations is so difficult for earthly people.
This made me re-analyze my sociological, economic ,and political beliefs, and change then so there is a perspective of evolution not of 20 or 30 next years but of many centuries 1,000-2,000 or more! And I must say that was not an easy process for the standards of my intellect.
I came also to realize, that direct e-democracy seem to me to be the very next best step towards such a long term evolution.  

Progressive institutions and laws must exist a small step ahead of the average evolution of the collective consciousness, but not much ahead, as the failure of the Soviet experiment has shown why.

A plausible question arises: Is it ever possible that this capitalistic (serve-the-self) civilization will ever become  altruistic, more serve-the-others and more socialistic? 
I think we must not be trapped by the terminology like "socialistic". It is not about socialism as we know it. It is about SELF-RESPONSIBILITY, and SELF-DETERMINATION of the individuals. And yes! It seems that we will brake the chains and truly acquire the basic 4 freedoms of Roosevelt: 
    1) Freedom of the metaphysical 
    2) Freedom of expression 
    3) freedom from the fear 
    4) freedom from the need. 

Non awakened individuals are like indirect slaves living in a delusion of freedom, while awakened individuals are like free people living a horrible scenario of indirect slavery. 
Sooner or later, most people will be awakened and they will become SELF-RESPONSIBLE , with SELF-DETERMINATION.  And this will mean a new type of socialism and direct democracy undreamed hither too. 
The oligarchic side power of money , from things to human existences ,  will be revealed and tamed , and gradually will be deactivated. Right now it is "sold" (by the "new order")  a GLOBALIZATION concept based on the MONEY , commerce and enterprises, as if more progressive and needed more for the prosperity of planet, compared to the political powers of national states. It is enforced that national states will become like big corporations (where of course the citizens will be like the employees working for the capital owners). But in fact, THERE IS NO PLANETARY PROSPERITY in a economic system where the money though the "free market" creates and supports VAST ECONOMIC INEQUALITIES  (under the statistical Pareto distribution). At least the old fashioned national democracies were fighting and reducing the natural economic inequalities that  the world of business was creating.
And by revealing the non-prosperous function  and delayed speed of civilization  evolution because of the economic inequities, through the money and free-markets, I do not implicate that any  dictatorship or any totalitarianism (like that of the ex Soviet Union, or of nazi Germany ) is a better solution! I do insist in the power of the INFORMATION and the INTERNET as a better globalization than the globalization of the  power of money.  I do believe in an electronic global e-democracy and global parliament, before any global government is ever to function. But of course the globalization due to the internet  is only the preliminary of a consciousness and telepathic-consensus globalization. The power of money must submit, and be dominated by the power of direct democracy , and not the opposite which is right now. As Dalai Lama often says "Humans are servants of the money ,and an oligarchy that has it, while money and its oligarchy should be servant to the totality of the  humans"



AS IT IS KNOWN THE HISTORICAL SOCIALISM (FORMER SOVIET UNION ETC.) HAD THE ADVANTAGE OF REDUCED (ECONOMIC) INEQUALITIES BUT  THE DISADVANTAGE OF LIMITED  FREEDOMS OF THE INDIVIDUAL.

AS IT IS  KNOWN THE HISTORICAL CAPITALISM (WESTERN EUROPE, USA ETC.) HAD THE ADVANTAGE OF MORE FREEDOMS OF THE INDIVIDUAL, BUT THE DISADVANTAGE OF  LARGE (ECONOMIC) INEQUALITIES.



THE DIRECT DEMOCRACY, CAN COMBINE BOTH ADVANTAGES ,  THE MORE FREEDOMS OF THE INDIVIDUAL (BECAUSE IT IS IN THE HANDS OF THE MAJORITY TO THE TAKE SUCH A DECISION) AND ALSO  REDUCED (ECONOMIC) INEQUALITIES (BECAUSE IT IS IN THE HANDS OF MAJORITY TO THE TAKE SUCH A DECISION TOO) THERE IS NO WARRANTY THAT THE MAJORITY IS MATURE ENOUGH TO TAKE TO THE SUCH A DECISION TO COMBINE THE ADVANTAGES BUT IT IS FEASIBLE.


Here is a nice video that suggests that shifting from the serve-the-self to the serve-the-others is directly linked in finding a true purpose of life



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vVsXO9brK7M

It seems that the social dynamics on earth are waves of two moves 
1) The first move is toward higher social inequalities and centralization of power. This moves is going backwards in the global macroscopic evolution (capitalism)
2) The second move towards less social inequalities and de-centralization of power. This move is going forward in the global macroscopic evolution (Socialism)

I put here a quote from a blog that I like:





THE 10 BASIC EARTHLY HUMAN FREEDOMS


1. FREEDOM FROM BEING IN ECONOMIC WANT.

Every man has a right to be free from economic want of survival, from the birth until old age, regardless of working conditions. Every man is entitled equally to the cultural heritage of knowledge, of methods for health therapies, of goods services and technological achievements for survival (food, clothing, health care, education, house, transport, etc.). This of course means the basic survival allowance at all ages.

No economic oligarchy or those that “have” have any right to manipulate the majority and tose that “do not have” through the need of survival.

2. FREEDOM FROM CRIMES WAR  AND INJUSTICE.

Not all people have good intentions for their fellowmen, and society, and thus there exist crime. Unfortunately economic inequalities create crimes. It must be tried through political and social institutions (taxes, benefits, etc.) not only reduced economic inequalities but create a system of essential and not only formal bureaucratic justice that protects every citizen or groups of citizens from injustice and crime. This includes the military defense against external enemy and criminal invasions.

3. FREEDOM OF THE HUMANS FROM THE VIOLENCE OF NATURE and those of the ways of natural life which are not in accordance with human soul consciousness and human spirit.

The cycle of blood and death, from animal to animal for food survival is something that for millennia man has tries to escape, and to shift from the jungle to a human society with mutual respect human rules, and laws with positive empathy, mercy, compassion, etc. This violence may still indirectly continue i in society, but to the extent that society is not a jungle, this means also that it is evolved. Man is looking iside him in order to find the way of mental, spiritual and cultural development and not necessarily in the ways of the visible biological life.

4. FREEDOM FROM ILLNESSES AND ARTIFICIAL GENETIC MANIPULATION.

Culture and psychic and scientific knowledge normally , develops so that increasingly releases each person from death and disease. It can not be accepted anywhere a hidden oligarchic scientific, genetic manipulationof the masses , in the past, present or future, of the human civilization from hidden groups, to another human civilization or society, (e.g. artificial viruses, falsification of DNA, artificial diseases and biological weapons, etc.) so as to exercise control, servitude, biological degradation, and manipulation.

5. FREEDOM OF THE SEX, COUPLES LOVE AND PARENTAL LOVE FROM violence, indirect slavery, envy, malignancy, lies, deceit, hypocrisy, manipulation and ulterior motives.

Love is a paramount experience, and must be protected.

The man should be morally and emotionally free. 

6. MORAL AND EMOTIONAL FREEDOM.

There is no more dangerous and insidious slavery of man by that from his manipulation by his emotions, desires and his weaknesses. .The emotional and moral world and how each person feels for himself, his actions and choices, that does not infringe the freedom of other people, it is perfectly within the individual's freedom of will, and not subject to control by others without mutual consent . Nor is it legitimate a direct or indirect moral emotional manipulation of the individual.

7. FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION AND CREATIVITY.

People should have the freedom of speech, oral and written, and the creative freedom of artistic expression, provided they do not violate the freedom of other people. This freedom is also directly correlated with cognitive and intellectual freedom.

8. COGNITIVE AND INTELLECTUAL FREEDOM.

No minority organization either with good or evil purposes has no right to hide from humanity, evidence from the human history, or of the history of life on earth, or observational results of natural phenomena, experimental results, or data related to the morphology of the planet internally or externally , or of other celestial bodies. Data on the knowledge of man, life, and physical reality, should not be hidden in order to retain the ignorance of the masses for easier manipulation and servitude, or for use of hidden knowledge at the expense of the many. Prohibiting research and knowledge, with different excuses is unacceptable. But also this knowledge and technology must not to be use against humans, or the life on the planet itself that humanity resides.

9. POLITICAL-SOCIAL FREEDOM OF (DIRECT) DEMOCRATIC SELF-GOVERNMENT.

Societies have the inalienable right to social democratic political self-governance. It is known that the most perfect form of democracy is direct democracy, which in today's society of information and the internet, is easily feasible.

Forms of hidden oligarchies, whether of financial, or of technological nature, or other form of power that consider humanity being of two speeds, is incompatible with this principle. Humanity should not be a 2-speed civilization ie a split in to a) to the masses who have to stay in ignorance, underdevelopment, and defective, without true freedom but a fraudulently imposed illusion of freedom, and b) in a tiny minority with abundance of issued money and high hidden technology, which is not a product of discoveries of the mankind, and that this minority secretly seeks to despise, dominate, manipulate and oppress as a parasite a "sinful" majority. Cultures with such polarization, it seems to have a low rate of evolution and are usually doomed to periodic partial or total self-destruction.

10. SPIRITUAL AND METAPHYSICAL FREEDOM. 

Man should be free from spiritual and metaphysical systematic control and alienation and must seek the moral and spiritual truth and development within him and the humanity that he lives.

We need to seek the creation of ourself, as perception and experience, inside us and inside the human society we are living.

Not everything from the teaches of the different religions are lies or worthless, but it should be understood that religions are not the monopoly of any source of morality and virtue, and every metaphysical superiority.

Nor should religions become the vehicle, of oligarchic, moral and spiritual manipulation of the masses (violating religious freedom principles and freedom of the will, etc.) or indirect influence for such respective finally manipulation of the masses by social, non-religious hidden or not, authority minorities, and oligarchies.








We may have to remind to  ourselves, in this economic crisis, the basic operating principles of the current societies.

THE BASIC PRINCIPLES OF THE CURRENT  HUMAN SOCIETIES

"The reality of the experience of life, is based on a system of spiritual and perhaps subconscious (implicit) or  explicit beliefs. Changing these beliefs will result in changing our reality and changing our fate. "

1) THE PRINCIPLE OF THE FREEDOMS OF THE INDIVIDUAL 
    This principle is crucial, as it determines that the society is to function without violating civil liberties. The seven basic personal freedoms are
1.1) The spiritual freedom (freedom of religion)
1.2) H freedom of political decision (Democracy, or rather direct-democracy)
1.3) The   freedom of he creative-expressions (freedom of speech)
1.4) The moral freedom (freedom from fear)
1.5) Economic freedom (freedom from  want)
1.6) The physical freedom (actions, activities).
1.7) The freedom of private property (having).

(Here Roosevelt is stating 4 of the essential freedoms
https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=5iHKtrirjlY)
         
        2) THE PRINCIPLE OF  (IN)EQUALITY
          Because of 7th individual freedom of private property, it is necessary the use of some form of money (not necessarily banking money). It is the nature of money and of the free market to create economic inequalities. If there was no private property, then we would not need to use some form of money and the economic and living standards inequalities  would not be inevitable. Only political power , especially direct democracy can  tame and reduce economic inequalities. Not the oligarchic economic power itself. Inequalities in society (economic, authoritarian, other social power etc.) is a source of misery, unhappiness, crime, lack of trust, mental illness, etc. The current social  inequalities are not identical with the actual psychic  meritocracy. A society with many inequalities has slower evolution  and is a less advanced civilization, compared to  a society with fewer inequalities. E.g. the killing capacity inequalities for survival in the jungle is a system of most slow collective evolution. From this principle it follows, that a monarchical or oligarchic society evolves more slowly than a democratic society. And   at least for this reason democracy  is preferred. Money and the economic power, can not unite people and bring prosperity, because it is in the nature of money to create  inequalities. The political power, particularly of direct democracy can tame and control  the economic inequalities with laws and institutions and bring more justice. The principle of equality applies also on to that all citizens are equal as far as the laws are concerned.

     
       3) PRINCIPLE OF SOLIDARITY-BROTHERHOOD
         This principle suggests that the primary treatment of each of our fellow man is positive and not negative. The morality of  mercy, compassion, and positive empathy is a key element, creating equality and the ability to combine up individual talents into a collective civilization of the society, so that  conversely each person can benefit at maximum from the society.

     


       4) THE PRINCIPLE  OF THE SOCIAL POWERS AND THEIR PRIORITIES.
           The power is not only the political power i.e. the legislative and the executive, but there are very significant other powers, such as economic (private sector), military, religious, and the authorities of the function of the state (public authorities, and services, justice, police, etc. ). To these we can add the more impersonal, like th power of science and technology.
 Furthermore we may distinguish the powers to
1) From people to people
 2) From people in inorganic physical reality.
Based on the principle of equality, the second type of power is ore appropriate and ideal for the humans compared with first type.
The powers have priorities and reversing these priorities can and has became a source of misery , unhappiness and crimes. E.g. The economic power (the private sector) should not take precedence and override the political power, or the political power to succumb and bend to the oligarchic economic power. Political power has the top priority among all. Money and the economic power, can not unite people and bring prosperity, because it is in the nature of money to create inequalities. The political power, particularly that of the direct democracy can tame and control  the economic inequalities with laws and institutions and bring more justice.
BUT every form of power, and the political also,  exists so as to serve  the human  (immortal) soul and its evolution. Power is not an end in itself.
   

       5) THE PRINCIPLE OF CONSISTENCY (Justice, education etc.)
           Society would be neither serious nor viable, if it did not practice  the principle of consistency. This means does not mean only that law should be enforced with  justice. E.g. in education, the principle of consistency means that, all the knowledge that is essential and crucial  for the survival of the civilization, must pass across the totality of the new generation. Not only the basic and elementary knowledge while the rest and more advanced to  a minority only. This maximizes survivability and the successful continuation of the civilization.

       6) THE PRINCIPLE OF PARTICIPATION.
    According to this principle, every individual has not only rights in society but also obligations. The basic obligation of each person which is also a virtue, is the participation in society and its functions. The person should tend to be social. Each individual is offering to the society according to his abilities, and is receiving from the society according to his needs.On the other hand, this principle, pushes the society to participate in wider sets of other societies, based always on the respect of the above principles.

7) THE PRINCIPLE OF THE SIMILARITY OF SCALE AND SUBSIDIARITY.

According to this principle, the small organizations (municipalities, local government, enterprises, universities, etc.) should tend to operate, in decision making, as the political democratic decision-making in the large scale public sector, and not vice versa.

The large scale, undertakes to decide only what the small scale is not in a position  to decide (subsidiarity). The larger the size of a society, the greater the opportunities, of a common person, to benefit  during the mortal life  from the society more than  what  he himself is able to offer to the society.




THE "NEW ORDER" seems to be the substitution  of the power of the royalties that ruled Europe and the planet a few centuries ago, with a similar oligarchic but this time HIDDEN power of BANKING MONEY. This was started in the end of the 17th century (after he establishment for the first time of the a private bank of London (England) that not only was issuing the English public currency, but owned it too(!!!) in monetary coup  in 1694 see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bank_of_England    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z6NcAzqAd6M  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-WfqdcnjvlA  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=roR3sSunqpo
This was done in a hidden masonic way (from where the conspiracies come), and the ancient masonry of Illuminati played a central and  a very important role. The whole effort seems that it was supported , executed and sponsored by the Draconian Alliance through the reptilian walk-ins (see post 22Α)

If we make the metaphorical equation money=blood, then we may imagine the whole of a nation as being a single human being. Then the current privatised monetary systems would correspond to someone having taken the liver outside the body, putting it in an artificial pump, and demanding to the human being: I will produce blood for you , but you will have to borrow it, and for every single drop that you will need, you will have to give it back with additional interest in blood. There is no doubt that not only the life of this human being is totally depended on the external owner of his liver, but also that he is condemned to death, as it is not possible for him to produce blood, and give it back as interest for the blood he is using. 

As an alternative metaphor, we can say that what the private central banks are doing in a society (like ECB and FED) can be compared with someone who suddenly has the monopoly of all the solar energy! In other words, it is decided wit an outrageous agreement , that all the solar energy will belong only to a private groups for profit, anyone who collects it, is equivalent to borrowing it from them, and has to return it plus an interest! No doubt that in this way everybody is condemned to bankruptcy sooner or later. 

This monopolist situation creates "The trick of the Draconian measures". Which is the next plan: With the situation that the central banks of euro is creating in the economy, we create a debt-crisis, and then we ask for "Draconian Measures", that is severe emergency measures (like utterly destructive thrift , or obligatory overwhelming borrowing etc)  that give us the opportunity to pass what we really want (like buying the strategic productive units of a society).


The central banks have subtracted the right to money from the states and public economies , and are able to issue as much money as it is demanded and even more as they want, and then lend it  every one else, who does not have the right to issue money, but are obliged to utilize money. In the way the central banks have become the supreme BLACK HOLES , PARASITES , CANCER and DEBT-CONTAMINATORS  of the economies.  The central banks simply KEEP STABLE the CREATION OF THE RE-OCCURRING   DEBT CRISIS. They do not cure them they simply create them and keep stable that are created periodically. They are the main source of creating overwhelming debt in the societies, as this is what they do, the lend, the issued currency which is claimed that they own it , for profit. We shall see in post 3,4 how the role of matching those willing to lend money and those willing to borrow money can be served, through the web, by other type of enterprises similar to real estate brokers, and abolish completely  the current role of the banking system.


“Let me issue and control a nation’s money and I care not who writes the laws.” Mayer Amschel Rothschild (1744-1812), founder of the House of Rothschild.
“The few who understand the system will either be so interested in its profits or be so dependent upon its favours that there will be no opposition from that class, while on the other hand, the great body of people, mentally incapable of comprehending the tremendous advantage that capital derives from the system, will bear its burdens without complaint, and perhaps without even suspecting that the system is inimical to their interests.” The Rothschild brothers of London writing to associates in New York, 1863.
Money is a new form of slavery, from the old simply by the fact that it is impersonal – that there is no human relation between master and slave.” Leo Tolstoy, Russian writer.

"The Government should create, issue, and circulate all the currency and credits needed to satisfy the spending power of the Government and the buying power of consumers. By the adoption of these principles, the taxpayers will be saved immense sums of interest. Money will cease to be master and become the servant of humanity.Abraham Lincoln


"Issue of currency should be lodged with the government and be protected from domination by Wall Street. We are opposed to…provisions [which] would place our currency and credit system in private hands.Theodore Roosevelt

Despite these warnings, Woodrow Wilson signed the 1913 Federal Reserve Act. A few years later he wrote: "I am a most unhappy man. I have unwittingly ruined my country. A great industrial nation is controlled by its system of credit. Our system of  credit is concentrated. The growth of the nation, therefore, and all our activities are in the hands of a few men. We have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most  completely controlled and dominated Governments in the civilized world no longer a  Government by free opinion, no longer a Government by conviction and the vote of the majority, but a Government by the opinion and duress of a small group of dominant men.Woodrow  Wilson



"The real truth of the matter is,as you and I know, that a financial element in the large centers has owned the government ever since the days of Andrew Jackson…Franklin D. Roosevelt (in a letter to Colonel House, dated November 21, 1933)


The planned obsolescence of products is not just wasting materials, energy and human work but also proves that the financial system is not really interested in meeting human needs nor interested in saving  the human work nor in saving  the resources of the planet, but is interested in the preservation and reproduction of  the power of economic oligarchy 



The dangerous current trend   is to make the public states operate like corporations (this is accomplish, typically at least, already in pubic state of USA and UK) This is a form of  contemporary insidious corrosive and obscure  fascism. At least as fascism was conceived by Benito Mussolini.






Here I put a quote with great clarity about the psychology of inequalities from a Blog that I am a follower


THE PSYCHOLOGICAL AND MORAL POLARIZATION BETWEEN THE OLIGARCHY THAT DOMINATES AND THE MAJORITY THAT IS DOMINATED

When someone comes in contact with the elite oligarchy that dominates (overtly or implicitly) he notes that according to them  the problem of the civilization is that the good, virtuous and worthy people are few  and are those that  dominate and have, while the bad , immoral and unworthy are the many,  who are dominated and have not. So the issue is how to defend the good and few, and will fight the bad and many.

On the other hand when someone comes in contact with the majority that is  dominated (overtly or implicitly) he notes that according to them  the problem of the civilization is that the  many are sufficiently good, virtuous and worthy, and are those that are dominated and do not have, while the few that dominate and have, are the bad, immoral, and unworthy to stand up to the planet circumstances. So the issue is how to defend the many and good, and fight the few and bad.



To my perception, it is quite certain, that the extreme inequalities between those that dominate and have against those who are dominated and do not have, are themselves the source of delays in the evolution of the civilization.




I believe that the ecological communities (eco-communities) seems to be the  pieces of modern earthly society closest to the values and principles of the advanced Andromedan Alliance human civilizations in the galaxy. The eco-communities seem to be a few centuries ahead in earthly evolution compared to the average earthly society.



Communities are rare in societies but very valuable. In the past centuries most of the communities had a religious specialization (monastery communities) , and were respected. 
In modern societies the communities have enhanced their focus to many different values like
eco-sustainability, spirituality, renewable energy model, art-creativity, better human relations etc


Communities are like the ideal city "Kalipolis"  in the dialogue of  "Republic" of the ancient Greek philosopher Plato. 


0. And ideal community has the 3 values of the French Revolution 
a) Equality
b) Brotherhood
c) Freedom 

Furthermore as far as freedom is concerned the 4 freedoms of Roosvelt

a) Freedom of the metaphysical
b) Freedom of expression
c) Freedom from fear
d) Freedom from need.

Communities are better understood by what issues  they do not have rather , than what they have , compared to standard societies.



An ideal community does not have 

1) Does not have economic oligarchy that rules the rest neither a minority in need. In other words no living-standards inequalities. Ideally they do not utilize money at all, which of course requires that they don't have private property, but rather a common property. This of course does not mean that , each one does not has cloths or personal belongings that he/she only uses. We mean more of the strategic resources of the community. From this ideal here are deviations that do allow private property, within some equality constraints, and even local complementary currencies. 

2) The system of decisions is more or less that of direct democracy , in other words based on equality, equal honor , respect and fairness.

3) There is no ecological destruction of the planet. They utilize permaculture or sustainable and ecologically friendly, agriculture. 

4) There is no animal slavery, animal killing,  and animal eating. The nutrition models is mainly vegetarian (as it contains less violence, more health, and more planetary economy).

5) There is highly reduced CO2 pollution of the atmosphere, and the energy model is that of clean renewable energy.

6) There is no vain over-activity,  waste of human efforts or waste of material energy. 

7) The behavior and interpersonal relations are without ulterior motives, pretension and deceptions. 

8) The utilized science, technology and arts are non-regressive (with  hidden negative intentions and negative results, behind a superficial goodness and positivism)

9) There is no criminality.

10) There is better ordering of values and exist higher spiritual principles.  









The next is a quoted text from an interesting Blog that I am its reader which makes some very intersting analysis of monetisation, demonetisation and human values.

"Start of quote .......................................


10. The de-monetisation of the basic physiological and security needs and individual initiative.

 

Individual initiative in organized endeavour and action is motivated by an escalation of needs or desires , that are according to A. Maslow as in the image in the right. The major part of the benevolent influences in the societies, come through the brilliant personal initiatives of great individuals. 
Notice that only the lower 2 (biological needs, safety needs) of the more than 8 layers in the escalation are monetised, in other words are acquired mainly by buying products or services with money. The other 6 require desires, efforts, skills and social supply that mainly do not involve buying them with money.
For example in the internet there is an increasing abundance of free electronic art products (music, visual arts free e-products like video, relevant software, multimedia games, free educational products, free architectural and engineering blue prints, etc) that fall mainly in the levels 5,6,7 of Cognitive needs, Aesthetic needs, Self-actualisation needs. Similarly the reputation of authors, artist, social figures, and even love be other people (levels 3, 4) mainly cannot be bought with money. The larger the width in the escalation the larger the number of people that feel fulfilled and struggle for the corresponding needs. The higher the  evolution of the  society,  the larger the number of layers of needs and desires that are not monetised, and the smaller the differences of the width of the layers of the escalation.

For an intersesting video on the open source economies see http://blog.ted.com/2008/04/16/yochai_benkler_1/ ). 

Here a good question is : Would we not prefer to have the two lower layers of basic  physiological and security needs de-monetised? In other words individual as birth right to have the resources for daily survival food, health care, basic transportation, and shelter,  for all their life? The planet does have the resources for this. And why to pay to be able to survive in our own planet? The moral impact on the individual to have to pay so as to survive is an almost immoral demand. The present economic system is very often overactive in vain, for good and services of highly questionable value and utility. It wastes vast volumes of energy and human activity. This becomes more clear as the technology advances, in energy, medicine, and agriculture. We could still keep the monetisation for the surplus monetary power (capital) that the initiative of some talented individuals would need for new services and products; (micro and macro economic scale). And we could still keep the monetisation for extra consumer or similar,  goods and services that an individual might desire to enhance the wealth of his household (household economics). An obvious counter argument here is that if this would be so, then many people would not bother to work at all. I agree that in such a situation a significant percentage of people would choose not to work and survive with the absolutely basic only. At first this is not fatal for society. Maybe we are not aware that in the populations of underground ants, only 50% of them work each day. So ants have 50% uneployment for millions of years and still their populations are doing well for millions of years! (see e.g.
http://blog.ted.com/2008/01/08/deborah_gordon/ and http://www.ted.com/talks/lang/eng/deborah_gordon_digs_ants.html ) Second  by a more intelligent re-design of our economic activities, we can reduce drastically the vain over activity of the current economic systems, so that having a percentage of the population not working is finally not a loss .And third some individuals take time to shift to a new interest, and the benefit of the society from an individual that loves what she (he) is doing is vastly larger than the benefit from an individual that is not liking what she (he) is doing and is doing it only so as to gain survival money.
       The next video is essentially a history of the current monetary system , after the abandoning of the rule of gold, till today. 
  The current laws around the central banks create the debt-crisis and over borrowing. The way they do it is , by lending with interest almost all the printed money, to small groups of private banks. Then the private banks lend it in their turn, and as in the domino effect, excess debt is created in the economic system.
     For example recently (end of 2011) the European Central Bank (ECB) printed 3-4 trillion euros, and lend them with interest to s small group of private banks.  When the money (base money M1) is printed by the central banks, according to the current laws belongs to the central banks. But essentially (and here new laws and institutes are required) the printed currency belongs to all citizens. It is a public good not a private good.  If we divide 3.5 trillion with 200 million Europeans it is a17,500 euros to each European citizen. Therefore with the current laws around the Central Banks, the result is that private banks lent to the citizens, enterprises and public sectors, the printed currency that already , in principle, belongs to them not to the banks. So a mechanism  must be created, with new laws and institutions that will distribute the printed currency directly to the 
      a) public sector 
     b) enterprises 
     c) households 
    without being debt, and without letting groups of private banks to monopolize the printed currency. Otherwise we get a banking-monetary oligarchy (or even monetary subtle tyranny) , that creates redundant debt and over-monetization of social life.



.......................................................................End of quote."



The current privatized monetary system  of euro and dollar, was supported and triggered to be launched by secrete  subdraconian reptilian  individuals, through masonries like the Illuminati. 

A very interesting blog that describes the problems of the current privatized monetary system of Dollar and euro is the Blog  overdebtmonetarysystem.blogspot.com

The current post is devoted to the design principles of a monetary system which would not suffer from over-debt. Such a monetray system should have two properties

1) Only the public state has the privilige to issue new currency (Ministry of Economics). No private for-profit organization can have such a privilige.

(This guarantees that the public sector will never be in over-debt)

2) The newlly issued currency each year, is circulated in society with less than 20% through debt and more than 80% through other non-debt channels of flow.

(This guarantees that the rest of the society will never be in over-debt)


Here is a site with similar ideas and recommendations for a su=imple change of the monetary system that would prohibit the crisis of over-debt returning periodically every 50-80 years.



As a general concept of electronic currency monetary systems, that do not create periodically over-debt crises   we may conceive monetary systems with the following rules

1) Only the public state (or collective agent)  has the privilege to issue or withdraw from circulation, currency. And when it is issued it is public good belonging to all people. The institution that issues the currency is public, not private and it  , circulates it , by less than 20% through lending, and by more than 80% through, investing, salaries, subsidies etc. 
2) It is not allowed by law any  banking system (including central banks) based on any fractional reserve rule, as this is very greedy, with very high leverage, unstable and dangerous for all the economy, as the history of more than 1 century has proved.  All lending and borrowing is done by organizations , that simply match the supply of lending, with the demand of borrowing, (without transferring the ownership of the money from lender to them, and then lending it to the borrower). The risk and ownership of the money is to the lender. The organization simply takes a fee or provision for any borrowing, like the real estate agents do in buying and selling transactions. 
3) There is an economic inequalities reduction tax, which creates the minimum unconditional income of all citizens. This is done through  a fixed tax rate on the total assets plus revenues of each citizen and enterprise (fixed assets and also revenues e.g. through a fixed percentage tax rate t<1  on an exponential function Exp(x) of the assets+revenues=  A, so that tax=tExp(A). The funds raised by the public state from this tax, are used to pay, the  minimum unconditional monthly income U of every citizen of any age, either working or not. The U covers,  basic minimum standards of living, (food, cloths, etc. , health care, transportation and shelter). 
4) There is a transparent, and agreed rule, to issue or withdraw currency, but mainly the amount of money is fixed. Such a default rule e.g. could be that the currency is almost a constant percentage m of an exponential function Exp(x) of the total wealth W of the society (the sum of  fixed assets and gross national product, If W the total wealth and M0 the amount of M0 currency, that is banknotes and coins, then M0=mExp(W). ) Or in a more evolved and fair society the currency is a direct function of the size of the population P: M0=kP
5) There are an agreed rule or   periodically redefined exchange rates with the other currencies






As one of the best example of  a monetary system without overdebt is the Gradido, 

(see http://gradido.net/en/Book/c/1/the_book  ) in which the ammount of money in circulation is constant!

The Gradido monetary system, besides the properties 1) and 2) above that make it a non-overdebt monetary system, has also four additional properties, which make it socialistic, egalitarian and ecological.

3) It creates a free  basic standard of living for every body.
4) It stimulates, monthly, a basic finacial equality among the citizens. 
5) It is very simplified egalitarian and efficient as far as taxes are concerned
6) It budgets directly for the  ecology and environmental protection , and it is in fact based on the wisdom of nature


The rules of the Gradido are very simple

1) Each month the public state issues for each citizen , 3 amounts of money (A,A,A)
(let us say A=1,000 gradido, or in general an amount that allows for a free decent life in normal standards of living). The first A, goes for the living needs of the citizen, the second A, goes to the state as if  a tax, and the third for the ecology and the environment.
2) As all natural resources , so the gradido currency too, and in order to avoid, inflation, due to the monthly issuing of currency, the currency loses in an obligatory way 50% of its value, annually (of about 5% monthly or 0.2% daily)



In this monetary system, the amount of circulating currency is in the average constant (assuming no diffusion outside the domestic economy) and if all monthly cash was saved each person would accumulate on the average about 20,000 gradidos. This amount is essentially depended on the size of the population and the standards of living. Variations where it can depend on the volume of produced goods and services in the society is discussed below. The reader is invited to download and study the book of gradido here

http://gradido.net/en/Book/c/1/the_book


Gradido offers directly a minimum guaranteed survival subsidy to all citizens of any age. 
If we think of the civilization as an inheritance of inventions (electricity, knowledge of flying, cloth making, medical drugs use, engineering knowledge, agriculture knowledge etc), then all newly born citizens of the civilization have equal right on the civilization inheritance.   But by not having money , when starting from childhood and then early young age of 18 years old, your are not entitled  to this inheritance! And then in the rest of your life if due to unemployment and debt-crisis in the civilization you continue not to be entitled to this inheritance or having right to it in severe unequal way compared to those that have accumulated the money in the society. This is obviously unfair and proves a negative intention behind it with negative consequences for both the atoms and the civilization.   Therefore a right of each individual for guaranteed minimum survival subsidy in all ages is a minimum correction of this injustice. It is a right similar to the right for free health care in all ages.



A very similar or almost identical monetary system had been applied in the previous century crisis,in 1932, in the Austrian town of Worgl. It had great success, unemployment almost disappeared, and the town from severe crisis, passed to prosperity. Unfortunately as it was very early at that time and all currency had to be backed up with gold, the Central Bank of Austria forced the town to stop using their currency. 
See e.g,

The concept of money corresponding not to gold (free-money or freigeld) was initially since the 19th century, introduced and developed by the economist Silvio Gesell

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silvio_Gesell

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freigeld

Also John Maynard Keynes had proposed in the previous major finacial crisis during the 20's and 30's of the 20th century, a global currency that its unit worth corresponds to a basket of mainly tangible goods of a national economy. It was called bancor:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bancor

Besides the case of Woergl and gradido, other successful realizations of this concept is the 
Wirbank in Switzerland since 1935

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WIR_Bank

http://www.wir.ch/

and a similar business in Italy, the currency sardex (and similar to it in some towns in Italy)

http://www.sardex.net/

In the cases of Wir bank and Sardex, the transactions in the local electronic currency are paying taxes as if they were done in the global existing bank-currency (CHF, and EURO).

Another example is the terra currency, by  Bernard A. Lietaer

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terra_(currency)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bernard_Lietaer

Here is a power-point presentation of  the basic ideas of Bernard A. Lietaer about how solving the current finacial crisis, through terra.

http://www.worldacademy.org/files/Options%20for%20managing%20systemic%20banking%20crisis%20by%20Bernard%20Lietaer.ppt

Monetary systems like the current (2012) of euro and dollar suffer from creating periodically (every 50-80 years of the Kondradieff  cycle in economics, see  ) over-debt in the economic system. The myopic greediness of the banks would not stop leading to such crises. And the Draconians, wanted at first the masses to be financially on their knees, before they would invade and dominate in a more direct force way.


About the direct democracy as a human right see the description of the next group

https://www.facebook.com/groups/331144230301729/

http://thomaslagrua.wordpress.com/2014/03/16/the-delusion-of-representative-democracy/